https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
We should have rejected "noexcept()".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords|ice-on-inval
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
And an extended test to check that various variables are in scope:
constexpr int x = 0;
struct A {
int a1;
void foo (int p) {
int foovar;
struct B {
int b1;
void bar1 () noexcept(x);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89100826acec92dfaa6ab8f2646b8053e7dbc67c
commit r11-6874-g89100826acec92dfaa6ab8f2646b8053e7dbc67c
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED