[Bug c++/96776] Missing tail call optimization when passing local variable by reference to yet another function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96776] Missing tail call optimization when passing local variable by reference to yet another function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96776 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Matheus Izvekov from comment #5) > There is one small issue with this though, but is even smaller, in that if > foo body was visible, and it did not escape that reference further, the tail > call

[Bug c++/96776] Missing tail call optimization when passing local variable by reference to yet another function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96776 Matheus Izvekov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/96776] Missing tail call optimization when passing local variable by reference to yet another function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96776 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96776] Missing tail call optimization when passing local variable by reference to yet another function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96776 --- Comment #3 from Matheus Izvekov --- Yeah Andrew I realized it just after I posted, disregard.

[Bug c++/96776] Missing tail call optimization when passing local variable by reference to yet another function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96776 Matheus Izvekov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/96776] Missing tail call optimization when passing local variable by reference to yet another function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96776 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED