https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #14 from John Eivind Helset ---
Added what I think is an even more minimal reproducer in attachment
pr97452.cc.
In the gimple I see:
:
resume.6:
_16 = Z::await_resume (&z);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #13 from John Eivind Helset ---
Created attachment 59162
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59162&action=edit
pr97452.cc
Reduced reproducer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #12 from David Ledger ---
(In reply to David Ledger from comment #11)
> This did not occur with GCC 10.2, it started in GCC 10.3:
>
> 10.3 (https://godbolt.org/z/jrdv31M17):
> ```
> 0x15d1ed3 A
> 0x15d1ed2 ~A
> 0x15d1ed3 ~A
> ```
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #11 from David Ledger ---
This did not occur with GCC 10.2, it started in GCC 10.3:
10.3 (https://godbolt.org/z/jrdv31M17):
```
0x15d1ed3 A
0x15d1ed2 ~A
0x15d1ed3 ~A
```
10.2 (https://godbolt.org/z/rrvKh9h6K):
```
0x2322ed1 A
0x2322
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|10.5
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #9 from Lewis Baker ---
> In terms of the standard do you think this is technically undefined behaviour?
Yes, I think this is something that Gor was looking into as a wording issue
that could do with some clarification.
I think the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|10.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to David Ledger from comment #6)
> Is this the right place for me to track this bug?
yes - it's just waiting for someone to have time to address it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #6 from David Ledger ---
Is this the right place for me to track this bug?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to David Ledger from comment #4)
> @Iain Sandoe
> In terms of the standard do you think this is technically undefined
> behaviour?
no, AFAICT, it's just a regular bug in the implementation.
(it's jus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #4 from David Ledger ---
@Iain Sandoe
In terms of the standard do you think this is technically undefined behaviour?
I tried bring this up with Std-Proposals but got no response at all.
I believe either I'm very bad at writing (likel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to David Ledger from comment #2)
> I'm happy to use this thread for the issue, I can just repost my link to the
> same issue here.
>
> My reporting of the issue is here, but Lewis Bakers example is s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
David Ledger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidledger at live dot com.au
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
probably a dup of 97433.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
17 matches
Mail list logo
