[Bug c++/98545] [11 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3352

2021-01-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98545 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98545] [11 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3352

2021-01-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98545 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25fc4d01a8ed1888e6a65597a3387349eb3c950c commit r11-6864-g25fc4d01a8ed1888e6a65597a3387349eb3c950c Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c++/98545] [11 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3352

2021-01-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98545 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/98545] [11 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3352

2021-01-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98545 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > but I need to figure out how to test this. [[gnu::used]] to actually emit the function.

[Bug c++/98545] [11 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3352

2021-01-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98545 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Candidate fix: --- a/gcc/cp/mangle.c +++ b/gcc/cp/mangle.c @@ -3349,7 +3349,8 @@ write_expression (tree expr) else if (dependent_name (expr)) { tree name = dependent_name (expr); -

[Bug c++/98545] [11 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3352

2021-01-05 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98545 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-05 CC|