https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99331
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jens.maurer at gmx dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99331
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99331
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b281edd801018ed703ce7bb0d49fef59ff8cef8b
commit r10-9688-gb281edd801018ed703ce7bb0d49fef59ff8cef8b
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99331
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Yeah, that's expected (but it's a bug!):
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/566449.html
Opening a separate issue would be nice, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99331
--- Comment #7 from Nikita Kniazev ---
The fix silenced the true warning (though it was saying 'may') in these:
template struct X {};
template X foo();
int x = sizeof(foo());
template struct X {};
template
struct foo { using t = X; };
foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99331
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
