https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:625dadaf5df5a2ae0d8c5660fd1eec8ba354479c
commit r11-8095-g625dadaf5df5a2ae0d8c5660fd1eec8ba354479c
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Since Comment 3 isn't a regression, I've opened bug 99980.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Another related test that we should probably accept:
// PR c++/99806
struct S {
void f(auto, auto, int = 3);
};
void
g ()
{
S s;
s.f(1, 2);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|10.4
--- Comment #4 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
A test that should be accepted:
// PR c++/99806
struct S {
template
void f(T) noexcept(B);
static constexpr bool B = true;
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
