https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105210
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
It seems that recent gcc trunk can't detect set-but-not-used in this code:
extern int g( int);
void f( int m)
{
int n;
n = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105210
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
It would appear that clang trunk is better at finding set-but-not-used
variables than gcc.
Here are some more cases:
./../trunk.git/gcc/genautomata.cc:5664:7: warning: variable 'alts_number' set
but not
