https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
--- Comment #9 from Roger Sayle ---
*** Bug 101090 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40f6e5912288256ee8ac41474f2dce7b6881c111
commit r13-1741-g40f6e5912288256ee8ac41474f2dce7b6881c111
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> The most likely culprit is r261705.
Yes this part:
(fold_builtin_n): Avoid setting TREE_NO_WARNING.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
The most likely culprit is r261705.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|spurious -Wunused-value on |[10/11/12/13 Regression]
11 matches
Mail list logo