[Bug c/16804] Function pointer assignment/initialization (missing warning)

2019-02-03 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16804 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c/16804] Function pointer assignment/initialization (missing warning)

2008-10-26 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-26 22:12 --- There is no warning in GCC 4.4, not even with pedantic. Should we really try to warn about this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16804

[Bug c/16804] Function pointer assignment/initialization (missing warning)

2007-01-09 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 15:06 --- Is the warning a good idea because it is a function call, so it may be a confused call to quak, or simply because it is unsigned converted to enum ? -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What