[Bug c/19031] [4.0 Regression] #pragma weak handling changes in 4.0.0

2005-01-01 Thread jh at suse dot cz
--- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz 2005-01-01 23:27 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] #pragma weak handling changes in 4.0.0 --- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-31 23:30 --- I think that this sort of thing *ought* to work. How,

[Bug c/19031] [4.0 Regression] #pragma weak handling changes in 4.0.0

2005-01-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-02 07:52 --- Subject: Bug 19031 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-02 07:52:31 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-decl.c c-lang.c cgraph.c

[Bug c/19031] [4.0 Regression] #pragma weak handling changes in 4.0.0

2005-01-01 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-02 07:54 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/19031] [4.0 Regression] #pragma weak handling changes in 4.0.0

2004-12-31 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-31 13:15 --- Not being able to build X is pretty critical. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/19031] [4.0 Regression] #pragma weak handling changes in 4.0.0

2004-12-31 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-31 23:30 --- I think that this sort of thing *ought* to work. How, exactly, to teach cgraph to make it happen is perhaps tricky... -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/19031] [4.0 Regression] #pragma weak handling changes in 4.0.0

2004-12-18 Thread philipp dot thomas at t-link dot de
--- Additional Comments From philipp dot thomas at t-link dot de 2004-12-19 00:41 --- Well, the question should be, what the semantics of weak aliases are, no matter how they're created. This is because using __attribute__((weak, alias())) leads to the same results as '#pragma weak'.

[Bug c/19031] [4.0 Regression] #pragma weak handling changes in 4.0.0

2004-12-17 Thread aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-17 10:30 --- Further testing showed that this is a fallout from unit-at-a-time: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp /opt/gcc/4.0-devel/bin/gcc -c test.c [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp nm test.o r bar V

[Bug c/19031] [4.0 Regression] #pragma weak handling changes in 4.0.0

2004-12-17 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2004-12-17 10:37 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] #pragma weak handling changes in 4.0.0 On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, aj at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: The question still remains, what are the symantics? Do we have to declare

[Bug c/19031] [4.0 Regression] #pragma weak handling changes in 4.0.0

2004-12-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-16 16:31 --- Well the following patch changed it: 2004-11-29 Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR c/7544 * Makefile.in (c-lang.o): Update dependencies. * c-lang.c: Include c-pragma.h.