http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #23 from Rodolfo Schulz de Lima rodolfo at rodsoft dot org ---
How difficult is it to add a parameter to add paths to precompiled header
search list *only*?
We have a big code base with #include pch.h in some source files.
If source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Church achurch+gcc at achurch dot org 2012-02-02
13:38:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 26553
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26553
Remove deprecation warning for -I- (gcc-4.6.2)
Patch against
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
David Rosa jdrosa at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jdrosa at yahoo dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard_sharman
: chris.litchfield at gmail dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
To: Christopher Ferguson/Burlington/i...@ibmus
Date: 12/06/2010 03:14 PM
Subject:[Bug c/19541] need another option to support what
com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
To: Christopher Ferguson/Burlington/i...@ibmus
Date: 12/06/2010 03:14 PM
Subject:[Bug c/19541] need another option to support what -I- did just
besides
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
Chris Ferguson fergusoc at us dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fergusoc at us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #17 from Chris Litchfield chris.litchfield at gmail dot com
2010-12-06 20:13:30 UTC ---
All versions since 4.0.0 seem to still have this issue. We are still awaiting
it, and its not assigned to anyone either.
--- Comment #15 from chris dot litchfield at gmail dot com 2010-05-18
19:48 ---
This is still a huge issue. We would wish to inhibit use of the CURRENT
Working directory to find include files. Basically FORCE every time a new
include file is found with #include to start AGAIN from
--- Comment #14 from Johannes dot Schwenke at gmx dot de 2009-01-14 12:18
---
Please, could anyone increase priority and serverity of this bug?
The current documentation that pretends that -iquote could work as replacement
is plain wrong. A proper replacement for -I- is needed. A
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-30 23:31
---
*** Bug 37291 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-30 23:37
---
*** Bug 37292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #10 from dvilleneuve at kronos dot com 2008-07-30 15:39 ---
An updated patch for gcc 4.3 is available in the following message:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00653.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #11 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 17:44 ---
Please ping that patch on the gcc-patches list.
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-18 21:52 ---
Changing component; the patch here doesn't touch the preprocessor at all.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from ISPARRY at BROCADE dot COM 2008-01-19 00:53 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Changing component; the patch here doesn't touch the preprocessor at all.
If you are changing the component, would not a better choice be driver than
c?
I agree the patch does not touch
16 matches
Mail list logo
