[Bug c/22098] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in compound literal gimplification

2005-07-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 17:50 --- Subject: Bug 22098 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-05 17:50:24 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-objc-common.h c-tree.h c-

[Bug c/22098] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in compound literal gimplification

2005-06-30 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30 15:00 --- Testing a patch for bugs 22013 and 22098. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigne

[Bug c/22098] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in compound literal gimplification

2005-06-16 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-16 22:04 --- > b = (size_t)(p = &(int []){0, 1, 2}[1]); What a perverse line of code -- I guess you got what you deserved :-) W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22098

[Bug c/22098] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in compound literal gimplification

2005-06-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-16 21:42 --- In fact looking at the trees, yes this is a dup of bug 22013 for the non optimizing case we don't duplicate the compound literal (well the same one) but with optimization turned on we do. -- http://gc

[Bug c/22098] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in compound literal gimplification

2005-06-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-16 21:36 --- Confirmed, this is very related to PR 22013, it might in fact be a dup of that bug. -- What|Removed |Added --