[Bug c/23075] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Redundant / bogus warning

2005-09-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-06 20:14 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/23075] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Redundant / bogus warning

2005-09-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-06 20:11 --- Subject: Bug 23075 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-06 20:11:09 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug c/23075] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Redundant / bogus warning

2005-09-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-06 20:07 --- Subject: Bug 23075 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-06 20:07:13 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-typeck.c tree-cfg.c

[Bug c/23075] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Redundant / bogus warning

2005-09-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | URL|

[Bug c/23075] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Redundant / bogus warning

2005-07-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 13:11 --- Confirmed, one warning comes from the front-end and the other bogus warning comes from the middle-end. I have not looked to see if we set TREE_NO_WARNING on the return and if the middle-end looks at tha