--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to fail||4.1.1 4.0.
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 16:16 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 15:53 ---
Subject: Bug 30360
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 5 15:53:31 2007
New Revision: 120488
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120488
Log:
PR c/30360
* libgcc2.c (__divdc3): Compare c and
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 15:50 ---
Subject: Bug 30360
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 5 15:50:25 2007
New Revision: 120487
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120487
Log:
PR c/30360
* libgcc2.c (__divdc3): Compare c and
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 15:49 ---
Subject: Bug 30360
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 5 15:49:05 2007
New Revision: 120486
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120486
Log:
PR c/30360
* libgcc2.c (__divdc3): Compare c and
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-01-03 21:31 ---
Subject: Re: New: Complex divide bug
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> fails when compiled with -O0 -std=c99 but succeeds when compiled with -O2
> -std=c99. ISO C99 says it should be (inf
