during compile of Template::Toolkit::Stash::XS (perl module)

gcc -v -save-temps -c   -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -mcpu=v9 -m64 -Wa,-xarch=v9 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O   -DVERSION=\"2.18\" -DXS_VERSION=\"2.18\" -fPIC
"-I/opsc_srb/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/sun4-solaris-64/CORE"   Stash.c
gcc: warning: -pipe ignored because -save-temps specified
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9
Configured with: ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --prefix=/opsc_srb/local
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.1
 /opsc_srb/local/libexec/gcc/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9/4.1.1/cc1 -E -quiet -v
-I/opsc_srb/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/sun4-solaris-64/CORE -D__arch64__ -D__sparcv9
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DVERSION="2.18" -DXS_VERSION="2.18"
Stash.c -mcpu=v9 -m64 -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC
-O -fpch-preprocess -o Stash.i
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/opsc_srb/local/lib/gcc/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9/4.1.1/../../../../sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
 /opsc_srb/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/sun4-solaris-64/CORE
 /opsc_srb/local/include
 /opsc_srb/local/lib/gcc/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9/4.1.1/include
 /usr/include
End of search list.
<built-in>:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation Fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.


-- 
           Summary: compile error / segmentation fault / 64bit compiler
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: armin at xos dot net
 GCC build triplet: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9
  GCC host triplet: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9
GCC target triplet: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30769

Reply via email to