--- Comment #4 from ethouris at gmail dot com 2010-05-18 07:14 ---
No matter which entity is actually affected in the example above, 'foo' is a
type of field used inside the entity. In all these cases, deprecation warning
should not be reported for the field of type 'foo'. It should be
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 19:42 ---
Confirmed, the C front-end also gives the warning.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ~/x86-local-fsf/bin/gcc t.c -S
t.c:4: warning: 'foo' is deprecated
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from david at luyer dot net 2007-03-26 21:27 ---
Two other related cases which generate warnings. I'm not sure
which is the correct syntax to mark a field deprecated, but
both are currently generating warnings, and marking a field
which uses a deprecated type as
--- Comment #3 from spark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 00:56 ---
# cat -n t.c
1 typedef __attribute__((deprecated)) int foo;
2 typedef
3 struct
4 __attribute__((deprecated))
5 bar1
6 {
7foo baz;
8 }
9 bop1;
