--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 23:55 ---
Subject: Bug 31673
Author: manu
Date: Wed Aug 27 23:54:36 2008
New Revision: 139681
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=139681
Log:
2008-08-27 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 23:56 ---
Fixed for GCC 4.4
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 17:36 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Created an attachment (id=13431)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13431action=view) [edit]
Suggested patch.
Joerg, please test the patch and modify any failing testcases,
--- Comment #1 from j at uriah dot heep dot sax dot de 2007-04-23 21:34
---
Created an attachment (id=13431)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13431action=view)
Suggested patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31673
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-23 21:39 ---
this message causes an unusual high amount of support traffic.
Does it? This is the first time I have seen a request for a change.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31673
--- Comment #3 from j at uriah dot heep dot sax dot de 2007-04-23 21:49
---
(In reply to comment #2)
this message causes an unusual high amount of support traffic.
Does it? This is the first time I have seen a request for a change.
When I first saw it, it took quite a while
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-23 21:57 ---
(Just reading that single article is enough, alas the rest of that
thread is getting *way* off.)
Sounds like this is a case of not reading the documentation again.
--
--- Comment #5 from j at uriah dot heep dot sax dot de 2007-04-23 22:05
---
(In reply to comment #4)
Sounds like this is a case of not reading the documentation again.
Well, unlike many others, he even *knew* something about C99, yet he
did not grok the error message's content. And
