--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-03 22:02 ---
you must be kidding.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-05-04 03:40
---
adding to personal favorite list :)
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-05-04 04:50 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> $ perl -wle 'print "int", "*" x 99, "p;"' >try.c && gcc try.c
> gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)
Yo, dude, that would take a seriously long program to even initialize
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-05-04 12:00 ---
Subject: Re: gcc segfaults on very long pointer chains
On Fri, 4 May 2007, bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:
> But seriously, while I do think that we should strive to compile even
> programs that are "weird" or "
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 20:46 ---
*** Bug 34308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
