--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 22:41
---
Fixed for GCC 4.4 (with unit-at-a-time being always on).
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #11 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 22:10 ---
ping
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31886
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 07:58
---
Honza, can you look into this pls?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31886
--- Comment #9 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2007-08-06 08:40 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I try to compile my giving C program using gcc-4.2.1, the problem still exists.
As my solution 1 suggests:
a caller function is inlinable only if all of its callee functions are
inlinable. while thi
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-08-06 06:44 ---
GCC 4.2.2 20070804 is able to compile newer kernels as is 4.2.1 20070628. I
guess 4.3 and 4.1 are the only series lacking this ability.
I am not allowed to change the "Summary:" to add "[4.3 Regression]" to the
begining s
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-08-02 17:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=14010)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14010&action=view)
Example of kernel file that causes "inlining failed" error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31886
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-08-02 17:18 ---
I can confirm this too. Here is the bug report I was to post - but I searched
to see if this was already reported ;) - Here are my notes:
tree-inline.c - sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed ... function body not
availabl
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 11:04 ---
Confirmed. Either we should not accept always_inline on a function not
declared inline (or warn in that case), or a function marked always_inline
should be considered for inlining always. Second, the
t.i:3: sorry,
--- Comment #4 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2007-05-10 05:33 ---
Dear Pinsky
In addition,
The problem will still exists even add a inline to line 1 of the program,
unless you add a static to line 1.
Sincerely yours
Zhouyi Zhou
--
zhouyi04 at ios dot cn changed:
What|
--- Comment #3 from zhouzhouyi at ercist dot iscas dot ac dot cn
2007-05-10 04:43 ---
Subject: Re: (different from bug report c/31077 and 29241) C
handling of always_inline attribute error and a solution
heh, pinkia, take a look at my solution1
On 10 May 2007 03:41:06 -
"zhouzhou
--- Comment #2 from zhouzhouyi at ercist dot iscas dot ac dot cn
2007-05-10 04:41 ---
Subject: Re: (different from bug report c/31077 and 29241) C
handling of always_inline attribute error and a solution
Dear pinskia,
If you lookup my solution current handling of conditions
for op
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 04:19 ---
I don't think this is a bug. The documentation for always inline says:
"For functions declared inline, this attribute inlines the function even if no
optimization level was specified."
That quote is from:
http://gc
12 matches
Mail list logo
