https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e12f66d96fe41c8ef8a0d01b6a8394cd6bce3978
commit r12-3947-ge12f66d96fe41c8ef8a0d01b6a8394cd6bce3978
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 51472
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51472&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
It passes all of gcc.dg/dg.exp I am doing a full bootstrap/test right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot
com
--- C
--- Comment #2 from sjackman at gmail dot com 2007-11-23 17:30 ---
I've always used `goto *123;' on embedded targets as a feature to be able to
jump to a constant address. This particularly useful feature should not be
removed. Is a simple change of syntax being suggested, such as `goto
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-10 02:21 ---
Confirmed, not a regression as far as the eyes can see.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
