[Bug c/32511] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] GCC rejects inline+weak function

2011-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511 --- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11 10:09:19 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 11 10:09:15 2011 New Revision: 168652 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168652 Log: 2011-01-12 Richard Guenther PR middle

[Bug c/32511] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] GCC rejects inline+weak function

2011-01-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511 --- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-10 15:48:51 UTC --- The original problem was fixed for GCC 4.6 with 2010-09-24 Jan Hubicka * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_entry_def): Add guessed field. (lto_symtab_resolve_symbols):

[Bug c/32511] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] GCC rejects inline+weak function

2011-01-10 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12 fr

[Bug c/32511] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] GCC rejects inline+weak function

2010-09-30 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2010-09-30 16:01:01 UTC --- I don't see it as different at all; I am arguing that the initial bug report was not actually a bug, and that the patch should be reverted.

[Bug c/32511] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] GCC rejects inline+weak function

2010-09-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc d

[Bug c/32511] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] GCC rejects inline+weak function

2010-07-12 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-12 13:46 --- Marking as regression. Weak symbols have multiple uses: allowing replacement is one, but they are also used to allow equivalent definitions in multiple translation units without linker errors. -- jason at gcc dot