--- Comment #2 from nmm1 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-11-12 14:25 ---
Well, yes and no. I am sorry, but that reply has raised several separate
points, so there is a threat of a thread split.
1) It is vaguely related to PR323, yes, but not simply. What I was saying
could
be considered is
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-11-12 16:29 ---
Subject: Re: Poor precision of complex division __divdc3 in
64-bit on Intel
Excess overflows in complex arithmetic is noted on
http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html but I don't think there's a specific
bug for it.
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-12 18:36 ---
What happens if you use -std=gnu99 because as far as I remember C99 complex
division is not enabled except with -std=gnu99/-std=c99 in 4.1 and before.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34071
--- Comment #5 from nmm1 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-11-12 18:58 ---
To Andrew Pinski: nothing - it was one of the first things I tried.
To [EMAIL PROTECTED]: PLEASE don't try to follow Annex G - that is about as
broken as it is possible to be; I use it as a horrible example in my
