--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-04 10:01 ---
Working on a fix.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keyw
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-04 08:49 ---
Subject: Re: Different results for inlined vs. non-inlined function
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 4, 2008, at 0:40, "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 4, 2008, at 0:40, "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-04 08:40
---
Hm, -0.0 >= 0.0 is folded to TRUE, as confirmed by:
printf ("%i\n", -0.0 >= 0.0);
This produces 1.
That is
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-04 08:40 ---
Hm, -0.0 >= 0.0 is folded to TRUE, as confirmed by:
printf ("%i\n", -0.0 >= 0.0);
This produces 1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35456
