--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-30 01:03 ---
As discussed, La\xff is the correct interpretation, and the strings changes
in C++0x and C1x make that clear.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-04-11 16:58 ---
Subject: Re: New: Dubious charset conversions
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, neil at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
GCC accepts the following with -ansi -pedantic -Wall without diagnostics
#include stdlib.h
wchar_t z[] =
--- Comment #2 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2008-04-12 04:40
---
Subject: Re: Dubious charset conversions
joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:-
GCC accepts the following with -ansi -pedantic -Wall without diagnostics
#include stdlib.h
wchar_t z[] = La \xff;
