[Bug c/37874] gcc sometimes accepts attribute in identifier list

2019-04-24 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37874 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c/37874] gcc sometimes accepts attribute in identifier list

2017-07-25 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37874 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/37874] gcc sometimes accepts attribute in identifier list

2009-11-22 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last

[Bug c/37874] gcc sometimes accepts attribute in identifier list

2008-10-20 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-10-20 12:48 --- Subject: Re: gcc sometimes accepts attribute in identifier list On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, sabre at nondot dot org wrote: as it turns out, f3 could also be considered valid in c89... because it makes x and y be

[Bug c/37874] gcc sometimes accepts attribute in identifier list

2008-10-19 Thread sabre at nondot dot org
--- Comment #1 from sabre at nondot dot org 2008-10-20 01:08 --- It also accepts this: void f4(__attribute__(())); -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37874

[Bug c/37874] gcc sometimes accepts attribute in identifier list

2008-10-19 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-10-20 01:51 --- Subject: Re: gcc sometimes accepts attribute in identifier list On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, sabre at nondot dot org wrote: It also accepts this: void f4(__attribute__(())); This is documented in Attribute Syntax.

[Bug c/37874] gcc sometimes accepts attribute in identifier list

2008-10-19 Thread sabre at nondot dot org
--- Comment #3 from sabre at nondot dot org 2008-10-20 02:10 --- as it turns out, f3 could also be considered valid in c89... because it makes x and y be implicit int's, not an identifier list. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37874