[Bug c/42199] A problem with -maltivec

2010-02-21 Thread galtgendo at o2 dot pl
--- Comment #3 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2010-02-21 21:22 --- There's new input in a different Gentoo bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305333 Apparently in certain conditions on ppc, bool is both defined and undefined. Unless you'll see that as bad code on openjpeg side.

[Bug c/42199] A problem with -maltivec

2010-01-03 Thread galtgendo at o2 dot pl
--- Comment #2 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2010-01-03 16:46 --- Created an attachment (id=19452) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19452action=view) preprocessed sources Finally I've got a response in the Gentoo bug. Info: Using built-in specs. Target:

[Bug c/42199] A problem with -maltivec

2009-12-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42199

[Bug c/42199] A problem with -maltivec

2009-11-27 Thread pinskia at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-27 19:12 --- Subject: Re: New: A problem with -maltivec Can you attach the preprocessed source for the configure test that is failing? It looks like the context sensitive keywords is causing the header to fail to compile. Sent