https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44179
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44179
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44179
--- Comment #3 from Zack Weinberg ---
It's come to my attention that people fairly often write `sizeof('x')` (or some
other character constant), _expecting_ it to evaluate as `sizeof(char)`. But
this is only true in C++. In C, `sizeof('x')` eval
--- Comment #2 from zackw at panix dot com 2010-05-17 23:59 ---
So it has to be a little smarter than the obvious, so what else is new.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44179
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-17 22:10 ---
I can see a case involving templates or macros where the warning does not make
sense and involving the new C1x/C++0x static_assert too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44179
