https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
--- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon ---
Indeed, I can now see it was fixed between r244372 and r244391, sorry for the
noise (there was a delay in my validations).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
It did fail yesterday because of a SNAFU on my part (sorry about that) but in
r244378 I committed a fix that should have resolved the failure. Please check
again and let me know if it still shows up (I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Jan 11 18:33:13 2017
New Revision: 244331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244331&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/47931 - missing -Waddress warning for comparison with NULL
gcc/tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor 2011-02-28 19:38:15
UTC ---
To add a suggested solution to my report: Since many (most?) comparisons will
be against NULL which can be defined as either 0 or (void*)0 I think it would
be best to diagnose both form
