http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-20
13:18:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm not aware of such a bug. Please file a separate bug report in
> Bugzilla with a testcase for this "erroneously omits the compile-time
> error for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-03-20 11:09:43 UTC ---
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
> either a compile-time error or a link-time error (the latter because gcc
> erroneously omits the compile-time error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-20
10:55:49 UTC ---
The test case, obviously based on the Linux kernel's BUILD_BUG_ON() macro,
behaves exactly as intended: since `offset' is not in fact a constant it causes
either a compile-time err
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Yakovlev 2012-03-20
10:03:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 26929
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26929
Test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-20
09:09:14 UTC ---
Testcase?
