http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
--- Comment #9 from jbeulich at novell dot com ---
But that's the point - the compiler takes the liberty to treat "start != end"
as always true, and "start < end" as being replaceable with "start <= end".
Hence a respective for() loop could in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, jbeulich at novell dot com wrote:
> That's why I gave the example of where this is coming from - the code
> obviously
> wants to be able to determine whether the data bl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
--- Comment #7 from jbeulich at novell dot com ---
That's why I gave the example of where this is coming from - the code obviously
wants to be able to determine whether the data block between the two labels is
empty. And no, using asm()-s for this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, jbeulich at novell dot com wrote:
> How that? How is code supposed to find out then?
Why does the code want to find out? If it's using these extensions it's
saying it'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
--- Comment #5 from jbeulich at novell dot com ---
How that? How is code supposed to find out then?
Perhaps briefly explaining where this is coming from originally might help: The
Xen hypervisor (as much as Linux) has a number of linker script con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I'd say that in the presence of those extensions, it should be considered
unspecified whether pointers to distinct objects at the same address
compare equal or not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
--- Comment #3 from jbeulich at novell dot com ---
Created attachment 30372
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30372&action=edit
auxiliary source (uninitialized data)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
--- Comment #2 from jbeulich at novell dot com ---
Created attachment 30371
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30371&action=edit
auxiliary source (initialized data)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
--- Comment #1 from jbeulich at novell dot com ---
Created attachment 30370
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30370&action=edit
main source
11 matches
Mail list logo
