[Bug c/60114] Incorrect column number for -pedantic and -Wconversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114 --- Comment #9 from yroux at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: yroux Date: Wed Jul 16 20:14:34 2014 New Revision: 212697 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212697&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ 2014-07-16 Yvan Roux Backport from trunk r209794.

[Bug c/60114] Incorrect column number for -pedantic and -Wconversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/60114] Incorrect column number for -pedantic and -Wconversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Apr 25 10:49:56 2014 New Revision: 209794 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209794&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/60114 c/ * c-parser.c (c_parser_initelt): Pass input_locatio

[Bug c/60114] Incorrect column number for -pedantic and -Wconversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone|4.9.0

[Bug c/60114] Incorrect column number for -pedantic and -Wconversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Patch posted: , it will probably need to wait for GCC 5.0.

[Bug c/60114] Incorrect column number for -pedantic and -Wconversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4) > (In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #2) > > It seems -pedantic and -Woverflow are different. When I issue > > $ gcc-trunk -c -Woverflow s.c > > th

[Bug c/60114] Incorrect column number for -pedantic and -Wconversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/60114] Incorrect column number for -pedantic and -Wconversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- -Woverflow is turned on by default, so it doesn't matter if you specify it or not; what matters here is the -Wpedantic (we have a bug about that discrepancy: PR59753). So yeah, expected.

[Bug c/60114] Incorrect column number for -pedantic and -Wconversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114 --- Comment #2 from Chengnian Sun --- It seems -pedantic and -Woverflow are different. When I issue $ gcc-trunk -c -Woverflow s.c then there is no overflow warning. (There is indeed no overflow.) But when I use $ gcc-trunk -c -pedantic s.c the

[Bug c/60114] Incorrect column number for -pedantic and -Wconversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|