[Bug c/63499] gcc treats unknown -Wno-xxx options differently than -Wxxx

2024-02-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63499 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pto at linuxbog dot dk --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug c/63499] gcc treats unknown -Wno-xxx options differently than -Wxxx

2015-10-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63499 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||e...@coeus-group.com --- Comment #5 from

[Bug c/63499] gcc treats unknown -Wno-xxx options differently than -Wxxx

2014-10-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63499 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3) > So, there's no way to programmatically check whether a flag is supported, > without resorting to grepping the output or something like that. Great.

[Bug c/63499] gcc treats unknown -Wno-xxx options differently than -Wxxx

2014-10-09 Thread zbyszek at in dot waw.pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63499 --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- So, there's no way to programmatically check whether a flag is supported, without resorting to grepping the output or something like that. Great.

[Bug c/63499] gcc treats unknown -Wno-xxx options differently than -Wxxx

2014-10-09 Thread zbyszek at in dot waw.pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63499 --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Ah, ok. Thanks.

[Bug c/63499] gcc treats unknown -Wno-xxx options differently than -Wxxx

2014-10-09 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63499 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|