https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 10 06:38:57 2015
New Revision: 221299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/65120
* c-common.c (warn_logical_not_parentheses): Don't war
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 9 18:26:52 2015
New Revision: 221284
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221284&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/65120
* c-typeck.c (parser_build_binary_op): Don't warn for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
It was just noted that
"But then again (!a == 0) is the same as !(a == 0), so the warning
is pretty pointless when the right side is constant zero."
so we should probably not warn for this case either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, just saw
> [ 2808s] ../drivers/xen/sfc_netfront/falcon_event.c:113:43: error: logical
> not is only applied to the left hand side of comparison
> [-Werror=logical-not-parentheses]
> [ 2808s] BUG_ON(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, you can also workaround with
if (b == !!a)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
And yes, the required
if ((!!a) == b)
is totally fugly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
12 matches
Mail list logo
