https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70060
--- Comment #4 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> If you want it to be initialized at runtime, do that yourself.
> The compiler can't do that, you could e.g. access bigarr from another
> compilation unit before th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70060
--- Comment #2 from Stas Sergeev ---
The question is not what happens now, but rather
can't it be done differently?
Is there any reason why gcc can't but it into .bss
anyway, and initialize from the startup code?
I realize this is not a bug but a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70060
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---