https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fa9022aa30b9c4dde965a0406943c8c0af5eb54
commit r11-9715-g0fa9022aa30b9c4dde965a0406943c8c0af5eb54
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
--- Comment #16 from Yann Droneaud ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #13)
> I have a patch which fixes all the testcases here.
I've checked my test cases using godbolt gcc trunk, and, yeah, thanks a lot !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
--- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek ---
Patch seems safe to backport to 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b7d9f8f51bd96d290aac230c71e501fcb6b21a6
commit r12-7772-g4b7d9f8f51bd96d290aac230c71e501fcb6b21a6
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Robert Dumitru from comment #10)
> I think https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99081 is also relating
> to this.
A similar issue, but I think the code for parsing these initializes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
Robert Dumitru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robert.dumitru@cyberthorstu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
--- Comment #8 from Yann Droneaud ---
See also this stack overflow question
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49081541/compound-literal-and-designated-initializer-warning-from-gcc-but-not-clang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
--- Comment #7 from Yann Droneaud ---
See also bug #84685 which is a very likely duplicate of this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
--- Comment #6 from Yann Droneaud ---
Found this one on stack overflow[1], and I find it a bit embarrassing:
struct {
struct {
int a;
int b;
} c[1];
} d = {
.c[0].a = 1,
.c[0].b = 1,
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
--- Comment #5 from Yann Droneaud ---
For a full combo, here's the almost original code that trigger the two errors
above with GLibc < 2.28, only one with newer Glibc.
#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
#include
#include
#include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
--- Comment #4 from Yann Droneaud ---
Also with the ({}) GCC extension:
struct a {
int b;
int c;
};
void d(struct a *);
void e(void) {
struct a f = {
.b = ({
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
Yann Droneaud changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yann at droneaud dot fr
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
18 matches
Mail list logo
