https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84563
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84563
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84563
--- Comment #2 from Ruslan Nikolaev ---
Summary (from the mailing list):
Pros of the proposed approach:
1. Ability to use guaranteed lock-free double-width atomics (when mcx16 is
specified for x86-64, and always for arm64) in more or less
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84563
--- Comment #1 from Ruslan Nikolaev ---
See also discussion in the gcc mailing list
