[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2023-06-13 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2023-06-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7474c46cf2d3715fe23871671c756fd5f65bc225 commit r14-1798-g7474c46cf2d3715fe23871671c756fd5f65bc225 Author: David Malcolm Date: T

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2018-08-07 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Eric Galla

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2018-05-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #8) To clarify: it's not correct to directly include the header in a GCC source file. Instead, one is expected to define the INCLUDE_STRING macro before including gcc/

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2018-05-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2018-05-06 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at mailed dot e4ward.com --- C

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2018-03-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- I have very little sympathy for anybody who thinks that an automated message from a compiler is "kind of personal", but how about instead of asking a question or equivocating with "you may want to ..." just

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2018-03-18 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- A similar sentiment to comment #1: https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/84op5c/usability_improvements_in_gcc_8/dvu7n5e/ > I find that "did you forget to '#include" is kind of personal message > and it's quit

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2018-03-16 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2018-03-16 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2) > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0) > > > > Reddit user "ramennoodle" comments: [...] > ...link for this one? https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/84op5

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2018-03-16 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

2018-03-16 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Hacker News user "dmckeon" commented: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16603185 > A small idea: reframe suggestions to be positive, future-looking, > and pro-active, such as replacing: > > did you fo