https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86420
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86420
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86420
--- Comment #5 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
this fixed the glibc test failures for me.
(-ftrapping-math does not affect the const folding of arithmetics, i guess for
library functions it does, it would be less confusing if that was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86420
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 9 10:56:47 2018
New Revision: 262517
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262517=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/86420
* real.c (real_nextafter): Return true if result is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86420
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86420
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86420
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to nsz from comment #0)
> gcc has no flag to say 'floating-point exceptions matter' (like
> -frounding-math for non-default rounding mode)
There is -ftrapping-math (on by default), although its
