https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87532

            Bug ID: 87532
           Summary: bad results from vec_extract(unsigned char, foo)
                    dependent upon function inline
           Product: gcc
           Version: 9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 44796
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44796&action=edit
patch to add powerpc testcase vec-extract-v16qiu-v2a.c  and -v2b.c

Debugging an issue with an existing testcase that exercises
vec_extract(unsigned char, #); and have run into this.  Using gcc trunk built
Oct 1, but believe this is not a new issue.

Results from a call into get_auto_n(a,i) are correct/incorrect depending on
whether the function being called is marked as __noinline__ .  

Attaching a stripped down and slightly modified version of an existing
vec-extract-v16qiu testcase.   Per the output below, the 'get_auto_n return
values are not consistent.


> cat gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.log  | egrep "^get_|PASS"
PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-v16qiu-v2a.c (test for excess errors)
get_auto_n return: -202182160
PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-v16qiu-v2a.c execution test
PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-v16qiu-v2b.c (test for excess errors)
get_auto_n return:  4
PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-v16qiu-v2b.c execution test

Reply via email to