https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24346
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> I see. This means the different cases in the testcase in question are
> not equivalent (when excess precision is involved) and thus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573
>
> --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> ---
> On Mon, 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > I wouldn't expect such a cast to be generated on the result of the
> > multiplication; I'd expect long double to be converted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #2)
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > where the first result is off. The IL looks like
> >
> > int r = (int) ((long
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> where the first result is off. The IL looks like
>
> int r = (int) ((long double) log (p) * (long double) inv_log_of_base);
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
