https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91206
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> (In reply to Nick Desaulniers from comment #4)
> > Thanks for the feedback, in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL369791, Nathan made
> > [unsigned] char -> [unsigned]sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91206
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Nick Desaulniers from comment #4)
> Thanks for the feedback, in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL369791, Nathan made
> [unsigned] char -> [unsigned]short warn only for -Wformat-pedantic, not
> -Wformat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91206
Nick Desaulniers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91206
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
There is a known ambiguity in the standard requirements where the argument
has the correct promoted type but not the expected type before promotion.
I wrote up some notes on this some time
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91206
--- Comment #2 from Nick Desaulniers ---
Ah, I did file a bug for this in LLVM's issue tracker:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41467
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91206
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
