[Bug c/97548] [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression involving a parameter

2022-03-17 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/97548] [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression involving a parameter

2021-12-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d3f53c595e1766ca0494e5f56f33b0ce49b3bb4 commit r11-9396-g7d3f53c595e1766ca0494e5f56f33b0ce49b3bb4 Author: Martin Sebor Dat

[Bug c/97548] [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression involving a parameter

2021-07-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.2|11.3 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener

[Bug c/97548] [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression involving a parameter

2021-07-23 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- The fix isn't very robust since it only handles redeclarations with VLA parameters that involve bounds that have the same name but not nontrivial expressions involving different names, like in this case: $ ca

[Bug c/97548] [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression involving a parameter

2021-07-23 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|bogus -Wvla-parameter on a |[11 Regression] bogus |