https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98541
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98541
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e9ee44d96e5bda8808dd9d8ccf58d2525383f6b
commit r14-5115-g6e9ee44d96e5bda8808dd9d8ccf58d2525383f6b
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98541
--- Comment #3 from Martin Uecker ---
Having to set the length to 0 for NULL pointers is problematic also because
zero-sized array types are now allowed in ISO C.
On the other hand, an optional warning that warns for all parameters declared
as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98541
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> and necessary to prevent this use case.
I mean: ...to prevent invalidating it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98541
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
