https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99623
--- Comment #10 from Sebastiano Vigna ---
Ahem no, my correction goes in the opposite direction it should go. I'll ask
suggestions to the library authors.
I really apologize for all the noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99623
--- Comment #9 from Sebastiano Vigna ---
Finally solved: the problematic statement
if (h == NULL) h = (struct prb_node *)>prb_root;
should just be
if (h == NULL) h = tree->prb_root->prb_link[0];
The position in memory of the two pointers is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99623
--- Comment #8 from Sebastiano Vigna ---
I'm sorry, I did the test on the wrong file. No, you cannot eliminate the &,
even if the type is correct, and h can be NULL at that point. I'll ask the
libavl maintainers their opinion. We can compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99623
Sebastiano Vigna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99623
--- Comment #6 from Sebastiano Vigna ---
Created attachment 50410
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50410=edit
Source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99623
--- Comment #5 from Sebastiano Vigna ---
Created attachment 50409
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50409=edit
Source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99623
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99623
--- Comment #2 from Sebastiano Vigna ---
Created attachment 50408
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50408=edit
Source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99623
--- Comment #1 from Sebastiano Vigna ---
Created attachment 50407
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50407=edit
Output of gcc with -O2
10 matches
Mail list logo
