[Bug d/104738] gdc.test/runnable_cxx/stdint.d FAILs on Solaris

2022-03-13 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104738 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug d/104738] gdc.test/runnable_cxx/stdint.d FAILs on Solaris

2022-03-02 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104738 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- char having the same set of values as signed char is valid. char is not however a "signed integer type" within the meaning of the standard, and so is never a valid definition of int8_t, de

[Bug d/104738] gdc.test/runnable_cxx/stdint.d FAILs on Solaris

2022-03-02 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104738 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- > In upstream druntime, stdint aliases were refactored to commonize so-called > "platform-independent" typedefs. > > As you've pointed out, none of

[Bug d/104738] gdc.test/runnable_cxx/stdint.d FAILs on Solaris

2022-03-01 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104738 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://issues.dlang.org/sh

[Bug d/104738] gdc.test/runnable_cxx/stdint.d FAILs on Solaris

2022-03-01 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104738 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0