https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
this is fixed, at least on Darwin, right?
is there some failing case remaining on Solaris or can we close this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
--- Comment #9 from David Faust ---
(In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #8)
> Thanks for the follow-up fix and apologies for the mid-air collision, I
> didn't see the %zu problem on the target I was testing.
No problem, thanks for the fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Faust :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:934da923a7295ae97e37425e269195c7d8770ef0
commit r14-1504-g934da923a7295ae97e37425e269195c7d8770ef0
Author: David Faust
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
--- Comment #6 from David Faust ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> (In reply to David Faust from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> > > > there seems to be a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to David Faust from comment #4)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> > > there seems to be a second fail on x86_64 darwin on line 970.
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
--- Comment #4 from David Faust ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> > there seems to be a second fail on x86_64 darwin on line 970.
>
> I tried the alternate patch on a number of x86_64,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> there seems to be a second fail on x86_64 darwin on line 970.
I tried the alternate patch on a number of x86_64, i686 and power Darwin
systems and bootstrap is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-06-02
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
--- Comment #1 from David Faust ---
Created attachment 55234
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55234=edit
alternate proposed patch
Thank you for catching this, and for the fix!
With the proposed patch on linux x86_64 I see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
12 matches
Mail list logo
