[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-14 Thread ivanr at syncad dot com
time though to narrow down the file to something smaller. Ivan - Original Message - From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:27 AM Subject: [Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+ >

[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-14 Thread ivanr at syncad dot com
time though to narrow down the file to something smaller. Ivan - Original Message - From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:27 AM Subject: [Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+ >

[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-14 14:27 --- (In reply to comment #7) > stabs+ is used for compatibility issues with Wine So, even mywin (and cygwin) have both moved over to dwarf2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446

[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-14 Thread ivanr at syncad dot com
--- Additional Comments From ivanr at syncad dot com 2005-03-14 14:23 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is there a reason why you are using stabs+, the default debuging format on solaris is dwarf-2 which > provides more information. stabs+ is used for compatibility issues with Wine --

[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-14 Thread ivanr at syncad dot com
--- Additional Comments From ivanr at syncad dot com 2005-03-14 14:20 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is there a reason why you are using stabs+, the default debuging format on solaris is dwarf-2 which > provides more information. yes, file compiles with default format but doesn't with

[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-13 Thread ivanr at syncad dot com
--- Additional Comments From ivanr at syncad dot com 2005-03-14 00:03 --- (In reply to comment #3) > It's 4.1.0 if I read correctly. Yes, actually it's 4.1.0 20050309 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446

[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-13 05:31 --- This is most likely the same problem as PR 18170, the error messages are similar. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446

[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-12 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-12 23:15 --- It's 4.1.0 if I read correctly. -- What|Removed |Added CC|