--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-30 15:21 ---
Looks like the kind of bug that cfglayout mode might introduce.
Will investigate...
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-30 15:21 ---
Looks like the kind of bug that cfglayout mode might introduce.
Will investigate...
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-30 15:22 ---
Which target is this, BTW?
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-30 15:29 ---
I've seen it on x86_64 and ia64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31391
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2007-03-30 15:21:40 |2007-03-30
--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-30 21:16 ---
At the end of loop2, the tryagain label is turned into a deleted label note.
This happens because the label has zero uses left in cfglayout. There are only
unconditional jumps to it, unconditional jumps are removed
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-30 23:29 ---
Index: cfgcleanup.c
===
--- cfgcleanup.c(revision 123362)
+++ cfgcleanup.c(working copy)
@@ -2034,6 +2034,8 @@ try_optimize_cfg (int
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-03-29 13:56 ---
This problem was introduced between 20070303 and 20070326.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31391
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
