https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33155
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
--- Comment #7 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2010-04-26
08:19 ---
This is fixed in 4.5.0 release.
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=148199
Danny
--
dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-04-26
22:29 ---
Patch submitted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg01977.html
Danny
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33155
--- Comment #5 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-04-26
08:24 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > > What is the status on this? Does reverting the langhooks.c change
> > > > remani
--- Comment #4 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-04-26
07:23 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > What is the status on this? Does reverting the langhooks.c change
> > > remanifest
> > > PR27067?
> > >
> > No.
--- Comment #3 from aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2008-04-26 04:13 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > What is the status on this? Does reverting the langhooks.c change
> > remanifest
> > PR27067?
> >
> No. PR27067 is fixed by
> cp/mangle.c (mangle_decl): Cal
--- Comment #2 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-04-26
03:17 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> What is the status on this? Does reverting the langhooks.c change remanifest
> PR27067?
>
No. PR27067 is fixed by
cp/mangle.c (mangle_decl): Call targetm.mangle_decl_assem
--- Comment #1 from aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2008-04-13 19:48 ---
What is the status on this? Does reverting the langhooks.c change remanifest
PR27067?
--
aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
