[Bug debug/34535] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx ICE

2007-12-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-27 08:28 --- Subject: Bug 34535 Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 27 08:28:16 2007 New Revision: 131195 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131195 Log: PR debug/34535 * tree-mudflap.c (mf_make_builtin):

[Bug debug/34535] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx ICE

2007-12-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-27 08:34 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/34535] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx ICE

2007-12-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-20 10:30 --- Posted 2 alternative patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg00983.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg00985.html (though IMHO both are desirable). -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug debug/34535] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx ICE

2007-12-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-20 17:35 --- *** Bug 34539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/34535] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx ICE

2007-12-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-20 01:20 --- I get these failures too on powerpc-linux-gnu. I think these were caused by: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg00728.html -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug debug/34535] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx ICE

2007-12-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-20 01:21 --- Confirmed. I think these were caused by: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg00728.html Actually it is obvious it was caused by that patch based on the backtrace. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org